Was it OK to beat slaves in the Old Testament?

-
Hi David,

I was talking to my husband about what we learned tonight, and when i got to the bit about slavery he immediately brought up Exodus 21:20-21. I have to admit, it does paint a rather ugly picture, but I'm hoping you'll have some insight you can share to help me explain it better. I've no doubt this is not the first time someone has come to you with this verse. :)

Thanks!
Sarah

Hey,

I’m not sure what bothers him.

These verses come within a larger context of legal code given to the Israelites by Moses. And, since I don’t know what bothers him, I’ll only say a couple things that might be bothering him…but I’m only guessing.

(1)    In nearly every single instance of the OT, a “slave” is really a “debt servant.” These were people who either (a) owed a person so much money that they had to go work for the master to pay him off; (b) were sold into that kind of slavery by a parent or relative to help work off the debt; or (c) were just so very poor that they sold themselves into slavery in order to survive (have something to eat, have shelter, etc.)

(2)    These legal codes are not moral prescriptions. These are not ways that the Israelites “should behave.” So, in this passage, the text is not saying or suggesting that masters should go around beating their servants. This is telling the Israelites that in the case that a master beats his servant, what the punishment would be. It in no way condones beating slaves. Masters were supposed to be good to their servants, but not all of them were.

So, does this help?

Sorry, I should have been more specific.  The part that bothers him is that the master is only to be punished if the servant dies. He understands that the servant is paying off a debt, but doesn't feel that they were expected to be treated well if the master could basically do whatever he wanted to the servant, free of punishment, as long as they survived it.

I was trying to explain to him the various ways that God took care of the servants in the Old Testament, but he brought up these verses, asking why there's no punishment for beating a slave as long as they don't die. Maybe it's the wording, or just the harsh truth. I just don't know how to make it sound less barbaric to him.

Hey,

No doubt that when you gave yourself up to a master in order to pay off your debt, you lost certain rights. Yet, while slaves were certainly not supposed to be beaten, the debt-slave was the “property” of the master at that point. 

However, there is no reason at all to think that “the master could basically do whatever he wanted to the servant.” In fact, these verses curtail abuse. I think that, in general, if you treated a slave poorly, they were to be set free (as is made explicit in 21:6). This punishment isn’t to encourage them to “go beat your slave.” Instead, this is to curtail the abuse of discipline when the slave did something wrong that demanded some consequences. That is, some debt slaves would do immoral/illegal things and there were negative consequences to pay for it. And, beating them with a rod was common punishment for doing something immoral or illegal. (Remember, there were no jails back then! And, the slaves couldn’t pay a fine to make up for whatever they did wrong since they were in debt slavery.)
DP

Okay, that makes sense. Thanks for the clarification! As you know, nonbelievers tend to pick apart every little verse, and this is one I struggled with explaining. I appreciate your time and insight.

Popular posts from this blog

The Audiences of Jesus

-
Image
When you read the Gospels carefully, you discover some great insights concerning the audience to whom Jesus speaks. There are four types of audiences addressed in Jesus’s ministry: (a) His opponents, (b) the crowds, (c) the disciples, (d) the Apostles. I want to briefly explore the final three audiences and reflect on why this matters. “The Apostles” Jesus’s very first disciples were “taken” from John the Baptizer’s group of disciples; Andrew (and probably John), then Andrew recruited his brother, Simon Peter. Soon after, Jesus called someone else from the same hometown as Andrew: Philip, who then brought his brother, Nathaniel (John 1:35-48). We see in these, and with others, Jesus used a network of relationships that already existed (e.g., brothers: Andrew and Simon Peter, John and James), business partners (Peter and Andrew fished together with James and John, Lk 5:10), while the others almost certainly would have known each other because they lived in the same towns (Cape...
Read more

"Did God breathe the Holy Spirit into Adam?" A conversation with a friend.

-
Image
Good Morning David, Hope all is well with you.  I have a question, In the beginning when God breathed the breath of life into man, was that the Holy Spirit?  I have been struggling with a series of sermons based on “God’s Invasion of Earth/Man”.  Perhaps it’s the word invasion that unsettles me, it seems negative.  There is an interim pastor at the church I attend . . . Several weeks now the sermons have seemed to point to saying that man was in the beginning filled with the Holy Spirit and the Spirit left when man sinned, Jesus came to bring back the Spirit, and Jesus has invaded earth and man to reconcile us back to God.  Which, I do see the theology that Jesus is our way to God, but something in this keeps bothering me.  I have to say, after reading your blog, I have said several times, that this man (who is a lawyer, called to be a pastor, not theologically educated) needs to learn how to preach to make his points clearer and precise, he seems to b...
Read more

"Who is Satan? What does he do? What does the Bible say about him?" My quick thoughts.

-
Image
What is “the Devil”? Where did he come from? Can demons possess Christians? I get asked these questions often. In my experience, people are usually squarely located on either the side of “I don’t believe in Satan/I don’t ever think about it” to the other side of “I pray against Satan and his demons all the time.” It reminds me of what C.S. Lewis said in The Screwtape Letters : “There are two equal and opposite errors into which our race can fall about the devils. One is to disbelieve in  their  existence. The other is to believe, and to feel an excessive and unhealthy interest in them.”  Not only do most people in my experience either ignore or obsess about Satan, they also tend to picture Satan like a character in a Bugs Bunny episode. Yet, the Bible never describes Satan’s physical appearance (there are metaphors, like in 2 Cor. 11:14, but no actual descriptions), probably because this Being is a Spirit and has no physical properties. How does the Bible pres...
Read more