Why would God allow suffering? Part 1
It seems the most common
explanation for why a person either can’t believe in the Christian God, or abandons
their Christian faith, is the existence of evil and suffering.
The classic response goes like
this: If God is all-good, he wouldn’t allow evil/suffering. If God were
all-powerful, he wouldn’t allow evil/suffering. So, either God is either not
all-good or not all-powerful, or perhaps, both.
The major objection being: there is no way an omnibenevolent and
omnipotent Being would allow evil/suffering.
First, let’s get one type of suffering out of the way with
celerity, viz., suffering caused by someone else’s evil choices. Every time
someone is murdered, beat up, raped, lied to, betrayed, etc., it’s because a
human has made an evil choice. So, to be clear, when a free-willed moral agent
decides not to do the right/good
thing, but instead chooses the bad/wrong/evil thing, it can involve causing
another person to suffer.
And of course, it sure is easy
to focus on the suffering other people
cause with their evil choices, and not pay attention to the suffering that we cause when we choose to do evil. Evil choices aren’t just done in other people. Suffering isn’t just
caused by other people. We do it. And
we do it well.
This kind of suffering, i.e.,
suffering caused by someone’s evil choices, isn’t usually that difficult for people
to accept rationally.
So, to answer the question, “Where
is God when people suffer from another human’s evil choices?” We say with ease:
He’s certainly aware and very, very disappointed that the person is doing the
evil. God hates evil. The one doing evil could have just as easily done the
right thing. This is why hell is a moral necessity: moral agents who choose
evil will receive a response from God. And they won’t like it. Our evil choices
do not go unnoticed.
And remember, free will is a
great, great good. It allows for morality, good choices, and good character. It
allows us to do genuine good deeds to other humans, animals, and creation.
So, to say it once more before
moving on: there is no reason to have outrage over suffering caused by the evil
choices humans make. It is not God’s
fault at all that a person chooses evil and causes suffering; it’s humanity’s fault. It is simply ridiculous
to blame God for a person’s choices. Be mad at them! Be outraged at them! God
is not to blame for what a free-willed moral agent chooses. This is why evil
has nothing to do with God’s goodness (humans are to blame) or power (God doesn’t
control our free will).
Second, there is a kind of suffering that any rational human
basically accepts. This is the kind of suffering we experience when we’re the cause of the suffering, or
when we’ve given someone else permission
to cause me to suffer. When my muscles hurt after I’ve been to the gym, it’s
perfectly acceptable to me. It’s my fault. I chose it. That suffering is
acceptable and fair. When I suffer at the doctor’s office when the needle is
inserted into my arm, it’s perfectly acceptable to me. It’s my fault that I
went to the doctor when sick. I chose to be in this position and knew the
consequences. There is no moral outcry over this kind of suffering.
The same is true for suffering
that other people experience when they are the cause of the suffering.
When someone crushes a can on their forehead and it causes a terrible headache
later, that’s perfectly acceptable to me. It’s his fault. That suffering is
acceptable and fair. There is no moral outcry over this kind of suffering.
The kind of suffering that
demands an explanation by most people is when a person suffers for a reason that is not caused by the
person. That is, people especially demand to know why suffering occurs when
a person is a victim.
It is basic human psychology –
we all want to know why we’re experiencing suffering to determine if the
suffering is fair or not. One of the most disturbing things I’ve ever heard was
a woman on a 911 call. She was fighting off an attacker who was about to rape
her. She yelled out, repeatedly, “Why?! Why?! Why?! Why?!” through her tears.
Now, do we really think that she wanted an intellectual
reason for why she was about to be raped so that being raped would be OK with her? Nonsense. The reason why
she bursts out with those repeated demands to know why is because of humanity’s
deep rooted sense of justice. It’s not fair that this man is about to rape her.
It’s not fair. She wants to know why he would do this to her when she’s done
nothing to deserve it. If he were to give her a reason that he thought was justification, would she had said, “Oh. I get
it. Go ahead and rape me?”
Of course not. She’s a victim.
I imagine another thing she would have screamed out had it occurred to her in
that horrible event is, “Don’t do this! This isn’t fair! I don’t deserve this!”
And she’d be right. She would be vindicated; he should be in prison, being
raped.
My point now is this: the
moral outcry people have toward suffering really only occurs when a person feels
that the suffering isn’t fair. When
it’s not deserved. When the person who is suffering isn’t the cause of the
suffering, or didn’t give someone else permission to cause the person
suffering.
So, the real problem with suffering is this: there is suffering in the
world that is not the person’s fault. That’s what bothers people. And the
demand humans have from God is this: “Why do you allow suffering for which
there seems to be no justification? That is, why do humans suffer at times when
it wasn’t their fault? Why would God cause or allow that kind of suffering?”
I have a few things to say in
response. That comes in Part 2.